top of page
Writer's pictureOhio Valley Allies

Unmasking the Truth about Fracking: New Insights from the Ohio River Valley Institute

Updated: Dec 2




Unmasking the Truth about Fracking: New Insights from the Ohio River Valley Institute


Ohio River Valley Institute’s New Pennsylvania Poll Revelations –with Ben Hunkler


In our latest episode of Exposure, we welcomed Ben Hunkler, Communications Manager for the Ohio River Valley Institute (ORVI), to discuss his team’s ongoing research and recent findings about the environmental and economic impacts of fracking in Pennsylvania and across Appalachia. This timely conversation sheds light on the realities of the oil and gas industry and what communities really want when it comes to energy and economic development.


The Disconnect Between the Fracking Narrative and Reality

Ben opened the discussion by sharing ORVI’s primary mission: to debunk the widely held belief that fracking is the economic engine of Appalachia. For years, the industry has promoted itself as the region’s economic backbone, creating jobs and bringing prosperity. However, ORVI’s landmark Frackalachia report reveals a strikingly different picture. Despite the industry’s promises, the 22 largest gas-producing counties in Ohio, Pennsylvania, and West Virginia have seen overall job losses and population declines since the fracking boom began.

This disconnect between the industry’s narrative and reality raises significant questions. If fracking isn’t benefiting local communities, why does it still receive so much support from policymakers? As Ben pointed out, ORVI’s research challenges decision-makers to re-evaluate the role of fracking and to consider more sustainable, people-centered approaches to

economic development.


The Public Wants Stricter Fracking Regulations

ORVI’s recent poll of likely Pennsylvania voters reveals a growing demand for environmental accountability. According to the study, an overwhelming 90% of respondents support stricter regulations on the fracking industry. This includes mandating disclosure of chemicals used in drilling, safer transportation of fracking waste, and increased setbacks from schools and hospitals. Perhaps most surprising, the survey found that 42% of Pennsylvania voters would support an outright ban on fracking.

These findings emphasize a shifting public perspective. As Jill noted during the conversation, many people are waking up to the health and environmental risks posed by fracking and want stronger protections for their communities.


Investing in a Clean Energy Future

In addition to detailing the challenges associated with fracking, ORVI’s research explores alternative economic pathways for Appalachia. Ben explained that initiatives like restoring abandoned mine lands, plugging orphaned oil and gas wells, and investing in clean energy projects—such as wind and solar—could offer far more local jobs than the fracking industry currently provides. These investments not only promote a healthier environment but also create a more resilient and diverse economy.

Highlighting the success of Centralia, Washington, Ben shared a powerful example of a community that transitioned from coal dependency to a clean energy economy. Centralia faced an economic crisis when its coal-fired power plant and mine shut down, yet the community turned things around by investing in clean energy and energy efficiency retrofits. Today, Centralia is creating jobs at a rate higher than the national average, illustrating that it’s possible to both protect the environment and foster economic growth.


The Challenges of Changing the Narrative

While Pennsylvania residents may increasingly support cleaner energy and stricter regulations on fracking, local policymakers are not always quick to act on these sentiments. Ben shared how ORVI has encountered resistance from local officials who remain hesitant to embrace alternative economic models, largely due to longstanding narratives about oil and gas.

Jill and Stuart highlighted how the oil and gas industry’s influence, paired with substantial funding for advertising, has created a pervasive “false narrative” about fracking’s benefits. This narrative persists in mainstream media and often overshadows the truth, making it difficult for communities to push back.


How You Can Help

As Ben emphasized, one of the most powerful things individuals can do is to start conversations within their communities. Share your concerns about fracking, talk about clean energy solutions, and inform others about the true impacts of the industry. Additionally, you can support organizations like ORVI by sharing their reports, attending local government meetings, and voicing your support for clean energy initiatives.

To read the full report on Pennsylvanians' attitudes toward fracking and learn more about ORVI’s ongoing work, visit Ohio River Valley Institute’s website.


Join Us in the Fight for a Healthier Future

Our conversation with Ben underscores the need for a more transparent and sustainable approach to energy in Appalachia. By challenging outdated ideas and championing clean energy alternatives, we can build a future that honors our communities, protects our health, and ensures economic stability for generations to come.



 

Citations:

Pennsylvania Department of Health, Bureau of Epidemiology Hydraulic Fracturing Epidemiology Research Studies: Childhood Cancer Case-Control Study Prepared by: University of Pittsburgh School of Public Health

Pennsylvania residents call for action after study links fracking to asthma and lymphoma

Study Funded by Shell Convinced Pennsylvania To Give Shell $1.6 Billion Tax Break

Chemical Recycling is a False Solution



 

All content presented in this podcast is intended for informational and educational purposes and reflects the informed opinions, personal experiences, and perspectives of the hosts and guests. While we strive to present accurate and well-researched information, the views expressed may include personal interpretations of the topics discussed. We encourage listeners to explore further information and form their own conclusions. Any references to specific organizations, individuals, or events are based on publicly available information and/or personal anecdotes and are not intended to misrepresent or harm any entity or person. This podcast is protected under the First Amendment, and we stand by our right to engage in open, good-faith discussions on matters of public concern

4 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

コメント


bottom of page